[GRASS-dev] Re: v.generalize and interpolation, dmax problem
paul-grass at stjohnspoint.co.uk
Fri Aug 17 11:21:59 CEST 2007
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Helena Mitasova wrote:
[Interesting/impressive test results...]
> which brings me to the main question - are there any objections to make dmax
> default value
> as large as the region to make sure that it does not add any points
> (currently it is set to 1.25 resolution value which is obviously not enough)?
> I have been trying to eliminate this parameter for years
> as it usually causes more problems than it solves.
For 7.x perhaps you could drop both the dmin and dmax parameters, and add
a note to the man page suggesting that the user preprocess their contour
data with v.generalize to resolve issues with closely-spaced points,
before running v.surf.rst?
Just a thought
More information about the grass-dev